Search T10 Reflector

Please enter search information below. The less data you enter, the more reflector messages will match. If you enter data in a field, then that data must exactly match some portion of the corresponding field in a matching message. AND conditions are separated by a + character. To search for messages containing both the words "SAS" and "OOB" in the email subject, use: SAS + OOB
Search Specification
Email Subject
Case Sensitive
Author's email address
Case Sensitive
Email dates Oldest
Newest 		Leave the Newest and Oldest fields blank to search all emails or enter yyyy/mm/dd in these fields to restrict the date range.
Emails Maximum number of messages to display at a time.

Search Results
Email Date Subject Author's Email Address
2007/09/20 Online UML Tutorials roger_cummings@symantec.com
2007/09/20 RE: USB Mass storage sub-class for MMC devices plavarre@lexar.com
2007/09/20 RE: USB Mass storage sub-class for MMC devices curtis.stevens@wdc.com
2007/09/20 ADT-2 Call for Final Technical Input Paul.Suhler@Quantum.com
2007/09/20 USB Mass storage sub-class for MMC devices billmc37@ctesc.net
2007/09/19 SPC-4, 07-449r9: Should we mandate AES-GCM or AES-CBC-HMAC for IKEv2-SCSI matt.ball@IEEE.org
2007/09/19 SAS PHY WG minutes posted and list of required items for completion. Alvin.Cox@seagate.com
2007/09/19 07-169r1 -- SCSI-ESP uploaded roweber@IEEE.org
2007/09/18 9/19 - 9/20 CAP meeting agenda gop@us.ibm.com
2007/09/18 Pending T10 Vote on ADC-2 change lohmeyer@t10.org
2007/09/18 SAS Protocol WG minutes posted lohmeyer@t10.org
2007/09/18 06-449r9 -- SA Creation proposal roweber@IEEE.org
2007/09/18 ANSI SES-2: Overall element status usage clarification Lisa_TanVivian@xyratex.com
2007/09/17 RE: More on 128-bit vs. 256-bit security gideon@decru.com
2007/09/17 SAS compliance checklist Mignon.M.Fernandez@bitmicro.com
2007/09/17 e07162r0 curtis.stevens@wdc.com
2007/09/17 [T13] e07162r0 curtis.stevens@wdc.com
2007/09/16 Optical devices, power consumption and rotation speed daviburg@windows.microsoft.com
2007/09/16 Re: More on 128-bit vs. 256-bit security matt.ball@IEEE.org
2007/09/16 More on 128-bit vs. 256-bit security Black_David@emc.com
2007/09/16 RE: 256-bit vs 512-bit strength security Larry.Hofer@emulex.com
2007/09/16 Single suite requirement? Black_David@emc.com
2007/09/16 RE: 256-bit vs 512-bit strength security Black_David@emc.com
2007/09/16 Posted: Microsoft Proposal keiji_katata@post.pioneer.co.jp
2007/09/16 Recent T10 documents uploaded since 2007/09/09 lohmeyer@t10.org
2007/09/14 [T13] T13 External Path Protection curtis.stevens@wdc.com
2007/09/14 T13 External Path Protection curtis.stevens@wdc.com
2007/09/14 RE: T10/STA Attendee Meeting Guide Neil_Wanamaker@pmc-sierra.com
2007/09/14 T10/STA Attendee Meeting Guide lohmeyer@t10.org
2007/09/14 RE: 256-bit vs 512-bit strength security Gerry.Houlder@seagate.com
(More)
[Return to the page.]