Search T10 Reflector
Please enter search information below. The less data you enter, the more reflector messages will match. If you enter data in a field, then that data must exactly match some portion of the corresponding field in a matching message. AND conditions are separated by a + character. To search for messages containing both the words "SAS" and "OOB" in the email subject, use: SAS + OOB
Search Specification
Email Subject
Case Sensitive
Author's email address
Case Sensitive
Email dates
Oldest
Newest
Leave the Newest and Oldest fields blank to search all emails or enter
yyyy/mm/dd
in these fields to restrict the date range.
Emails
10
30
100
300
500
Maximum number of messages to display at a time.
Search Results
Email Date
Subject
Author's Email Address
2007/09/20
Online UML Tutorials
roger_cummings@symantec.com
2007/09/20
RE: USB Mass storage sub-class for MMC devices
plavarre@lexar.com
2007/09/20
RE: USB Mass storage sub-class for MMC devices
curtis.stevens@wdc.com
2007/09/20
ADT-2 Call for Final Technical Input
Paul.Suhler@Quantum.com
2007/09/20
USB Mass storage sub-class for MMC devices
billmc37@ctesc.net
2007/09/19
SPC-4, 07-449r9: Should we mandate AES-GCM or AES-CBC-HMAC for IKEv2-SCSI
matt.ball@IEEE.org
2007/09/19
SAS PHY WG minutes posted and list of required items for completion.
Alvin.Cox@seagate.com
2007/09/19
07-169r1 -- SCSI-ESP uploaded
roweber@IEEE.org
2007/09/18
9/19 - 9/20 CAP meeting agenda
gop@us.ibm.com
2007/09/18
Pending T10 Vote on ADC-2 change
lohmeyer@t10.org
2007/09/18
SAS Protocol WG minutes posted
lohmeyer@t10.org
2007/09/18
06-449r9 -- SA Creation proposal
roweber@IEEE.org
2007/09/18
ANSI SES-2: Overall element status usage clarification
Lisa_TanVivian@xyratex.com
2007/09/17
RE: More on 128-bit vs. 256-bit security
gideon@decru.com
2007/09/17
SAS compliance checklist
Mignon.M.Fernandez@bitmicro.com
2007/09/17
e07162r0
curtis.stevens@wdc.com
2007/09/17
[T13] e07162r0
curtis.stevens@wdc.com
2007/09/16
Optical devices, power consumption and rotation speed
daviburg@windows.microsoft.com
2007/09/16
Re: More on 128-bit vs. 256-bit security
matt.ball@IEEE.org
2007/09/16
More on 128-bit vs. 256-bit security
Black_David@emc.com
2007/09/16
RE: 256-bit vs 512-bit strength security
Larry.Hofer@emulex.com
2007/09/16
Single suite requirement?
Black_David@emc.com
2007/09/16
RE: 256-bit vs 512-bit strength security
Black_David@emc.com
2007/09/16
Posted: Microsoft Proposal
keiji_katata@post.pioneer.co.jp
2007/09/16
Recent T10 documents uploaded since 2007/09/09
lohmeyer@t10.org
2007/09/14
[T13] T13 External Path Protection
curtis.stevens@wdc.com
2007/09/14
T13 External Path Protection
curtis.stevens@wdc.com
2007/09/14
RE: T10/STA Attendee Meeting Guide
Neil_Wanamaker@pmc-sierra.com
2007/09/14
T10/STA Attendee Meeting Guide
lohmeyer@t10.org
2007/09/14
RE: 256-bit vs 512-bit strength security
Gerry.Houlder@seagate.com
(More)
[Return to the page.]